Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Interpreting Bad News


Surrogates for incapacitated patients in intensive care units must evaluate proposed medical interventions in the light of the patient’s values and wishes.  For this reason, it’s important that surrogates, typically a spouse or a child, understand the prognosis for their loved ones.  A recent article in The Annals of Internal Medicine by Lucas S. Zier and colleagues, “Surrogate decision makers’ interpretation of prognostic information,” suggests that decision makers interpret the prognosis differently according to its favorability for the patient's survival (http://www.annals,org/content/156/5/360.abstract).
Over a three-year period, 80 surrogates for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit at a San Francisco hospital were asked to interpret 16 prognostic statements for hypothetical patients, unrelated to their loved ones.  For example, “If a doctor says ‘He will definitely survive,’ what does that mean to you?”  Participants were asked to place a mark on a probability scale corresponding to the patient’s probability of survival from “Will survive (100% chance of survival)” to “Will not survive (0% chance of survival).”  Respondents whose answers varied markedly from the prognosis were individually interviewed.
The researchers found that the respondents interpreted favorable prognoses correctly but that their interpretation of negative prognoses (5% to 50% chance of survival) tended to be more optimistic than warranted by the prognosis.  Interviewees explained these discrepancies in terms of the need to be positive and the reluctance to take at face value doctors’ predictions, since these are sometimes wrong. 
Naturally, I wondered how patients themselves view such prognoses. My guess is that they give a more favorable interpretation to negative predictions of their own survival.  Given a 5% chance of survival, many patients probably figure that they’ll be among that 5%.  Somebody has to be, after all.  A friend of mine, for example, has survived with pancreatic cancer for more than five years, when fewer than 5% live that long with the disease.
As for myself, I hope I’ll greet a negative prognosis, when it comes, realistically.  I know that I harbor a terminal disease.  The only question is whether that or something else will carry me off.  I won’t want aggressive treatments when the likelihood of surviving them is low and when the extra months of life that they provide are likely to be few.  That’s how I feel now.  I hope I’ll still feel that way when the time comes.

2010-2012 Anchises-An Old Man’s Journal All Rights Reserved

No comments:

Post a Comment